imgres

So here’s the problem - it has three parts…

The Congolese jungle is riddled with militia groups, who roam around raping and murdering tens if not hundreds of thousands of innocent people every year - 5 million dead in the last 10 years gives you some idea.

Those same innocent people live largely from the money they make from digging holes in the ground and pulling up small quantities of minerals that they can sell because electronics companies like Apple and Sony need them to make laptops and phones.

The murdering and raping militia groups also profit from the trade either by controlling mines themselves or by taxing the transport of the minerals.

Ergo - every time you buy a new iPhone, you are supporting the innocent people but also inadvertently helping the raping and murdering bastards.

The solution devised by two US senators is currently passing through Congress - The Dodd-Frank Act will force all electronics companies to prove where their minerals come from. Under the terms of the law, Apple, Sony etc will have to be able to show that the minerals they use didn’t come from areas that were under rebel militia control.

Sounds great. Put the onus on the world’s wealthiest companies to take responsibility, so that maybe something might get done. Right?

Wrong.

The response from the electronics industry this week has been to censure the very idea of Dodd-Frank. The industry’s lobby group, the US Information Technology Industry Council, this week warned that rather than embrace the law and start to sort out these supply chains, the big companies would just look elsewhere. The effect, they warned, would be only to encourage business away from DR Congo and thereby rob ‘hundreds of thousands’ of Congolese of vital jobs and throw them ‘into poverty’. Murder and rape or Poverty - helluva choice isn’t it?

What the big electronics companies are effectively saying is “We’re happy to make billions of dollars from the Congo as long as we all turn a blind eye to the murder and the rape. But if you try to make us do anything about it, then it’ll be your fault that everybody starves to death.”

Herein lies the real problem. As long as the industry takes a collective standpoint, nothing will get done. So, how do we get ONE of these companies, just one, to break rank and say, “You know what? We contributed to this mess, so we’re going to stay and invest in helping to make it better.”?

Because that would be a company whose laptop/phone, I’d buy.

 

This week I heard a presentation at the Royal Society of Arts by Constraining Consumption author Chandran Nair. What we do in the West over the next 40 years doesn’t really matter, argues Nair, because by 2050 there’ll be 5.5 billion Asians and only 750,ooo Westerners. It’s a pure numbers game and thus the “planet’s future will be determined by what happens in Asia”.

In Nair’s dystopian vision of the future, Asian governments will have to become even more totalitarian so as to impose the draconian measures necessary to prevent their populations from consuming as we do in the West. Imagine if 3 billion people in China and India all wanted to buy a car, there just aren’t enough resources available to make them. So, it’s totalitarian rule or total bust? Helluva choice isn’t it?

What it means is that Asia must find another way forward i.e. not the Western way. Not only must it constrain consumption but it must also create employment at all costs. Factories will have to remain labour intensive and not be drawn into introducing machines to do the work. Imagine, if you will, a permanent state of Industrial Revolution.

Which brings me to two recent publications from Apple.

First the good news. Apple’s quarterly financial reports for 2011 show revenues up by 83% as the number of iPhones sold has more than doubled from a year ago. All together now - “Woo hoo!”

Second the even better news. Apple’s Supplier Responsibility report for Q1 2011 shows that Apple are working hard with the Asian suppliers of those same iPhones to ensure that they ‘provide safe working conditions [and] treat workers with dignity and respect.” You’ve got to just love those guys at Apple, don’t you?

Get into the detail of the second report and you’ll see that in particular, they’ve turned their attention to the infamous Foxconn factory in China where tragically, 16 young men and women took their own lives over one month in May 2010. Every one of them jumped to their deaths from a factory or dormitory window.

So what exactly are the world’s most profitable company doing to solve this awful problem in their supply chain? Well the report tells us - Apple are working with Foxconn on ‘several fronts’ but first and foremost they are ‘attaching large nets to the factory buildings to prevent impulsive suicides’.

Yes that’s right. The dignified and respectful solution to your impulsive suicide attempt is to be caught in a large net in full view of your co-workers. After which, you’ll presumably be lowered safely to the ground and encouraged to go kill yourself off the premises - or at least a safe distance from Apple’s reputation.

What the report does not go into is what might be driving these youngsters to such desperate measures in the first place. When I interviewed Foxconn workers outside the factory gates in Sept 2010, the answer to that question was clear - working on a production line where you are required to perform the same mindless task up to 10,000 times per day, every day, 7 days a week DOES YOUR HEAD IN! Eventually 16 young Chinese workers just couldn’t take it any more and literally ran for the nearest exit. Many more told me that it had crossed their minds more than once.

Chandran Nair told the assembled crowd this week that he was surprised how well his work had been received by the wider business community. I’m not. This is exactly the kind of intellectual ammunition that Asian leaders and businessmen (like Foxconn’s Terry Gou) lap up to justify maintaining a twin track path to economic development. Now they can continue to add to their untold personal wealth and at the same time argue that it’s in the planet’s best interests. Because if you buy into Nair’s argument, then you accept as inevitable the need to continue to exploit a labour intensive workforce in Asia as Apple/Foxconn does.

It is not right that what we do in the West, has or will have no bearing. As long as an Asian workforce is making products for Western consumption, then we in the West have a responsibility to support their demands for as much freedom as we enjoy and that should include working in a factory without need for nets.

 


A version of this post appeared in
Wanderlust Magazine April 2011


Crouched down low at the bottom of a Congolese mine-shaft was a little more excitement than I’d bargained for. I had been determined that I wasn’t actually going to go all the way down there myself but then circumstances took over. I think that’s par for the course in DR Congo. The air in the mine was so stiflingly hot and damp that I could hear myself panting in the pitch darkness. Only by shooting off a picture from my camera could I see from the LCD screen where I was. The mineshaft was propped up with roughly fashioned branches from the jungle outside and at the bottom, some 200 metres below the surface, it was less than two and half feet high. In front of me, the man I’d been following, Boniface was preparing to take a hammer and pick to the seam of minerals in the face of the rock. As soon as he brought down his hammer, pieces of dirt began to fall from the ceiling above me and I knew I’d seen enough – it was time to get out of there.

 

Despite the fact that we’re all travelling more and that the world seems to be becoming smaller and smaller, there are still some places that retain that sense of being the stuff of myth and legend. Eastern Congo is one of those places. The Foreign Office, commonsense, even your mother will tell you not to go there but the curious and adventurous traveller knows deep down that if you want to really know what it’s like then you have to go yourself.

This is very much the ethos of my new book Unfair Trade – How Big Business Exploits the World’s Poor and Why It Doesn’t Have To. My mission over the last year has been to see and experience for myself what it is like for those who work at the start of the supply chain where life is hard and often dangerous. Researching this book has taken me around the globe passing through not just Congo but Cote D’Ivoire, Afghanistan and the borders of Burma and Northern Laos amongst others.

Before Independence in 1960, Congo was actually quite the de rigeur adventure holiday destination. Wealthy Europeans keen to see Africa’s “heart of darkness” took cruises up the Congo River on luxurious steam powered ships and stopped off at well appointed cities with old colonial names like Leopoldville and Stanleyville. Those cities were built by the Belgians with the profits from the country’s mineral deposits. But ever since King Leopold of Belgium handed the country back to its people, the cities and the people living in them have fallen on hard times.

Congo’s recent troubles began when the ethnic violence of the genocide in neighbouring Rwanda spilt over its borders. Rwandan militia groups have occupied the jungles of Eastern Congo ever since, terrorising its people while simultaneously profiting from the trade in its minerals. Back to back wars have left 5 million people dead in the last 10 years. If what has happened there had happened in Europe it would have been labelled World War Three but instead, Congo has been largely overlooked by the world’s media.

The reason I was in DR Congo was to investigate the trade in minerals from Eastern Congo, specifically cassiterite, a mineral that is necessary for the production of the chips that go in laptops and cell-phones. I went to try to put some flesh on the ethical debate about trading in minerals from conflict areas by spending time talking with miners like Boniface. While others in the West debate the rights and wrongs of a ban on the mineral trade, these brave men risk their lives every day when they descend into precariously constructed mineshafts in search of minerals. They don’t have any association with militia groups nor have they ever been involved in the fighting, for Boniface and the other miners, digging simply represents their only way to make a living.

It’s a difficult dilemma for the international community but what is clear from listening to the miners is that the last thing they want is for us to turn our backs and walk away. Many say that their dream is to work for a Western mining company, to have proper safety equipment and a weekly wage. But for now at least, mining this way is how they feed their families and so if it were banned, they would only be forced to find ways to smuggle it out of the country.

It’s a stark lesson in the danger of taking an ethical standpoint from afar. The reality is often complex and the issues need to be investigated at first hand to be fully understood. The big players within the international electronics industry who depend on the minerals Boniface and his colleagues dig out of that mine could do listening to those issues for themselves.

 

 

 

© 2013 Conor Woodman Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha